Skip to content

This page provides independent, editorially reviewed information on pet-care business software. Compare Time To Pet vs Pet Sitter Plus: pricing, features, pros, cons, and which is right for your business.

Time To Pet vs Pet Sitter Plus

Updated October 2026 · Pet Sitting Software software comparison

Time To Pet

Time To Pet

Visit ↗

Purpose-built pet-sitting and dog-walking software with GPS visits, from $25/mo

★ 4.9 279 reviews Free trial from $25.00/month (Lite)
Pet Sitter Plus

Pet Sitter Plus

Visit ↗

Cloud pet-sitting & dog-walking software with GPS visit tracking, from $30/mo

★ 4.8 140 reviews Free trial from $30.00/month (1 user)

At a Glance

Criteria Time To Pet Pet Sitter Plus
Overall Rating ★ 4.9
279 reviews
★ 4.8
140 reviews
Starting Price $25.00 /month (Lite) $30.00 /month (1 user)
Pricing Model Paid Paid
Free Trial ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
Deployment cloud, mobile cloud, mobile
Best For Freelancer, Smb, Mid Market Freelancer, Smb, Mid Market

Strengths & Weaknesses

Time To Pet
Pet Sitter Plus
Pros
✓Purpose-built for pet sitting and dog walking — strong request-based scheduling and visit workflow
✓All-in-one suite purpose-built for pet-sitting and dog-walking — scheduling, invoicing, payments, staff, and client portal, with the full feature set on every plan
✓GPS check-in/out on the staff app verifies visits in the field
✓Exceptional, responsive customer support (Capterra 4.9) plus personal onboarding coaching
✓Integrated payments (cards, ACH, Apple/Google Pay) with auto-charging and bulk invoicing
✓GPS check-in/check-out and client visit reports that give pet owners proof each visit happened
✓Client and staff mobile apps, plus report cards with photos and short videos
✓Transparent public pricing with per-region currency (USA/UK/AU) and a 30-day no-credit-card trial
✓Low $25/mo entry on Lite and a 14-day no-card free trial
✓Mature and stable — the vendor has built it since 2009 with a large active user base
✓Native QuickBooks Online and Zapier integrations
✓Built-in card and ACH payments plus QuickBooks sync for accounting
Cons
✗Team plan is priced per active staff member, so the bill rises in busy periods as you add walkers
✗No dedicated native mobile app — staff access is web/browser-only, the most frequent reviewer complaint
✗Some users report occasional missed or late notifications of new client requests
✗Invoices cannot be edited once created, and price changes force you to redo everything
✗Payroll and reporting are seen as limited by power users
✗No bulk editing of multiple pets or services at once
✗Text messaging is a paid add-on, not included in the base plan
✗Cost rises steadily with team size on the base-plus-per-active-staff model — pricey beyond about three staff
✗A few workflows (holiday blocking, client announcements) are less customizable than users want
✗Some setup learning curve despite the training resources
—
✗Limited customization in certain areas and awkward blocking of unavailable time slots

Who uses pet care software — and what each person does with it

🧑‍💼 Business owner

Watches bookings, revenue, retention and no-shows by service and by staff member on one dashboard — sees which services and repeat clients actually make money.

📞 Front-desk / reception

Books appointments, checks pets in and out, takes deposits and payments, and sends automated reminders so slots stay full and clients show up on time.

✂️ Groomer / walker / sitter

Runs the day from a mobile app — sees the schedule, logs services and notes, tracks GPS check-ins on walks, and sends report cards and photos to owners.

🐾 Pet parent / client

Books online, uploads vaccination records, pays and tips, and self-serves rebooking from a client portal — then gets an automatic reminder and review request.

The flow the software runs end to end: client books online → vaccination and intake collected → appointment scheduled and staff assigned → check-in → service delivered with notes and photos → payment and tip → automatic rebooking and review request. Each stage hands off to the next without re-keying.

Who Should Choose Which?

Choose Time To Pet if…
  • Your team fits the freelancer or smb or mid market profile
  • Budget matters — Time To Pet starts $5 cheaper per month
  • You prioritise peer-verified quality — higher rating (4.9 vs 4.8)
  • Your preferred deployment is cloud or mobile
  • Purpose-built for pet sitting and dog walking — strong request-based scheduling and visit workflow
Choose Pet Sitter Plus if…
  • Your team fits the freelancer or smb or mid market profile
  • Your preferred deployment is cloud or mobile
  • All-in-one suite purpose-built for pet-sitting and dog-walking — scheduling, invoicing, payments, staff, and client portal, with the full feature set on every plan

Our Verdict

Time To Pet
Time To Pet edges ahead with a higher overall rating (★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8) and stronger review volume (279 vs 140 verified reviews) .

Time To Pet targets freelancer/smb/mid_market businesses with paid pricing starting at $25.00/month (Lite). Its strongest selling points include purpose-built for pet sitting and dog walking — strong request-based scheduling and visit workflow and gps check-in/out on the staff app verifies visits in the field.

Pet Sitter Plus targets freelancer/smb/mid_market businesses with paid pricing starting at $30.00/month (1 user). Its key advantages include all-in-one suite purpose-built for pet-sitting and dog-walking — scheduling, invoicing, payments, staff, and client portal, with the full feature set on every plan and exceptional, responsive customer support (capterra 4.9) plus personal onboarding coaching.

Both tools are reviewed independently — see the full reviews below to dig into integrations, implementation timelines, and user sentiment.

Free · No credit card

Book a vendor demo

Vendor-facilitated. We forward your request to their sales team within 24 hours.

  • Choose a preferred date + time slot
  • 30-minute product walkthrough
  • Custom pricing based on your seat count
GDPR / CCPA compliant. Data forwarded once, not resold.
Request received. We forwarded to sales. Confirmation email en route.
Compare: